Old-growth logging near the Avatar Grove on Vancouver Island.

Ben Parfitt: Sneaky Liberals are planning a B.C. forest giveaway

Given the short duration of the upcoming legislative session and the provincial election to follow, a government plan to introduce a scant two-paragraph bill granting it powers to fundamentally alter the course of forestry in B.C. is disturbing, to say the least.

According to several sources who have been briefed on the legislation, the bill would give the provincial cabinet powers to grant forest companies de facto private control over public forestlands without first having to notify or consult with the public.

Instead of companies enjoying rights to log set volumes of trees on public forestlands, companies would gain dramatically expanded powers to log trees on defined areas that in effect become their own semi-private fiefdoms.

The bill follows a year in which the government has faced mounting criticism over a forest-health crisis due to decades of over-cutting and an unprecedented mountain pine beetle attack. Numerous sawmills now face closure, with all the hardships that portends for many rural communities.

It also follows the losses of sawmills in Burns Lake and Prince George due to explosions and ensuing fires. In the wake of those events, various government documents were leaked indicating that the provincial government was revisiting a controversial “rollover” idea first pursued 25 years ago. At that time it met with such a groundswell of political and public opposition that the initiative was scuttled.

Then-provincial forest critic and MLA for Prince Rupert, Dan Miller, called it “privatization on a massive scale” and warned: “Never before in the history of the province has this kind of giveaway been contemplated.”

The policy as then envisioned is precisely the one now being contemplated by the government. Minister of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations Steve Thomson indicated so in a letter last September to Steve Zika, CEO of Hampton Affiliates, which owns the destroyed Burns Lake mill.

If the new legislation passes, the provincial cabinet could grant forest companies the rights to roll over numerous volume-based forest licences into area-based Tree Farm Licences. TFLs bestow by far the most secure rights of access to publicly owned trees of any arrangement with the provincial government. The new legislation could massively expand their use, beyond the limited number now issued.

TFL lands still remain publicly owned and the government still collects timber-cutting or stumpage fees from the companies logging them — although distressingly few such fees in recent years. But once a TFL is granted, a company has something that is very difficult for the province to take back without triggering prohibitively expensive compensation payouts.

Worse, TFLs become tradable or sellable assets. If the right corporate suitor comes along, say a pension fund that has zero interest in maintaining sawmills, let alone building desperately needed value-added facilities like furniture plants, so be it.

Forest-company executives routinely trot out the trope that TFLs provide them the security they need to invest in renewing forests. But such claims are not credible. Companies have historically made the minimal reforestation investments required by law, regardless of the licensing arrangement with the government.

The “security” argument is a smokescreen, then, designed to draw attention away from the real reason companies covet TFLs — their asset value.

The government will no doubt argue that by granting Hampton a TFL it gives the company the assurance it needs to build a new mill in Burns Lake. But in making the offer to all other forest companies, the government opens the door to a rapid escalation in corporate control of public forestlands. With the change, some of the biggest forest companies in the province — Canfor, West Fraser and Tolko — could gain unprecedented sway over public forestlands, without having to make any investments along the lines of what Hampton proposes.

Perhaps the most disturbing aspect of such a fundamental change on the eve of a provincial election is that the government leaves unaddressed the most evident problems.

Our forests face the gravest health crisis in modern history.

Communities that have for decades depended on our forests for their social and economic well-being, face equally daunting challenges.

Yet there is a way out. Policies that would end rampant wood waste, policies that would earmark certain forested areas as available to log in exchange for company commitments to make minimal investments in new or modernized mills, policies that would result in greater, more effective reforestation efforts, are all within our grasp.

In their absence, giving what remains of our forests away is lunacy. A responsible government would delay implementing such contentious legislation and give the public time to digest the implications of such a move. Or the Opposition could signal now that should such a bill pass it would be immediately repealed upon a change in government.

Ben Parfitt is a resource-policy analyst with the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives.

Link to online article: https://blogs.theprovince.com/2013/01/27/ben-parfitt-sneaky-liberals-are-planning-a-b-c-forest-giveaway/

Ancient Forest Alliance

Roadside logging project put on hold

Direct link to video: https://youtu.be/BZt05Abbz9E

PORT ALBERNI – Logging company Island Timberlands is putting its plans to harvest a roadside section of forest near the Alberni Highway summit on hold. They are pressing the pause button on the logging project after being hit with a wave of outrage from citizens in the Valley. Many say a roadside cut will destroy the beauty of the region and could affect tourism.

Today the chainsaws were silenced, but the logging company is saying harvesting in some capacity will likely take place at some point. Island Timberlands is now preparing to reopen lines of communication with local stakeholders to see what is the best course of action.

A map detailing the area of planned logging.

Alberni’s "Hump" gets reprieve as Island Timberlands delays logging plans

Island Timberlands has for now backed away from plans to log the fringe of trees along the Hump near Port Alberni.

“We considered our plans over the weekend and now we are putting a temporary suspension on the harvest of the buffer along the highway,” Island Timberlands spokeswoman Morgan Kennah said in an interview Monday.

“We are still planning to harvest it in the future, but probably after we have replanted the harvested area behind and given it time to grow.”

That is likely to take several years, Kennah said.

The one caveat is that, if trees in the buffer pose a blowdown threat on the highway, they will be removed, she said.

The company has already logged most of the area behind the 40-hectare buffer meaning that if the remaining trees were removed, drivers heading to Port Alberni or the Tofino/Ucluelet area would be looking at a large clearcut.

The logging plans, resulting in the denuding of about 800 metres beside the highway, sparked outrage in the community and a vigil was planned for Monday evening, when logging was scheduled to start.

Opponents said views along the hilly section of Highway 4, know as the Hump, would be destroyed and could affect Port Alberni’s efforts to become an eco-tourism centre.

Others were concerned about evening road closures of 15 minutes at a time, from Jan. 21 to Feb. 8 and Highway 4 is the major road access to the Alberni Valley.

Island Timberlands was given permission by the Highways Ministry to close the road so logging could be conducted safely.

Public concerns about the inconvenience of the traffic interruptions and the visual aspect of the cutting brought about the change of plans, Kennah said.

“We always listen and, sometimes, we react in a way that might be considered favourable,” she said.

“This is one where we have heard lots of concern and we can be flexible on it.”

Alberni Valley resident Chris Alemany, organizer of Monday’s Witness the Hump Clearcut event, was startled by the change of heart.

“Wow. That’s great news. That’s amazing,” Alemany said.

“Maybe they saw just too much opposition. I think people were pretty upset about it,” he said.

The get-together may go ahead as a celebration and Island Timberlands representatives would be welcome, Alemany said.

“It could be a good party.”

Alberni-Pacific Rim NDP MLA Scott Fraser, who had reacted in horror to the potential destruction of the viewscape in a tourist corridor, said public opinion appears to be forcing Island Timberlands into making some community-friendly decisions.

“That’s good news. It’s an important step for the company to take, given the public reaction on this issue,” he said.

“A reprieve is better than nothing.”

Last week Island Timberlands said it is reconsidering logging plans at nearby McLaughlin Ridge because of community concerns about critical habitat for wintering deer and effects on the community watershed.

Link to Times Colonist article: https://www.timescolonist.com/news/local/alberni-s-hump-gets-reprieve-as-island-timberlands-delays-logging-plans-1.53108

A map detailing the area of planned logging.

Island Timberlands’ logging of Alberni summit could denude the Hump

The forested drive to Port Alberni and the west coast of Vancouver Island will soon include a close-up view of a clearcut.

On Monday, Island Timberlands starts logging about 40 hectares of privately managed forest land beside a hilly section of Highway 4 known as the Hump. It tops out at the 400-metre-high Alberni summit, about nine kilometres east of Port Alberni.

The forest company says the harvest, stretching about 800 metres along the highway, will not make a significant difference. But others, including Alberni-Pacific Rim NDP MLA Scott Fraser, say it will destroy the views and make a mockery of Port Alberni’s efforts to be an eco-tourism centre.

“It’s like the worst of the old days,” Fraser said. “This is a tourism corridor and part of the economic future of the Alberni Valley.”

Island Timberlands spokeswoman Morgan Kennah said the company is trying to minimize the visual impact. It will leave shrubs and saplings on the side of the highway to act as a buffer and some taller trees will be left farther back from the highway, in an area that has already been cut, to provide texture, she said.

“There will be no visual buffer against the highway due to safety concerns,” Kennah said. “We can’t leave tall trees because the wind could blow them over.”

The cutting is part of Island Timberlands’ normal harvesting, Kennah said. “This just happens to be adjacent to Highway 4.

“If you are focusing on your driving, you shouldn’t be seeing a large opening. It’s not a vast size of area that’s being cleared.”

The B.C. Transportation Ministry will allow Island Timberlands to close the road for up to 15 minutes at a time, from Jan. 21 to Feb. 8, so logging can be conducted safely.

The closings will be from Monday to Thursday, 7 p.m. to 6 a.m.

The closings rub salt in the wound, Fraser said.

“It’s the only road access to the Alberni Valley, Tofino and Clayoquot Sound, and it’s already a bottleneck. To make it worse, it’s being shut down to enable the destruction of the tourism corridor,” he said.

“We are shooting ourselves in both feet. It’s hindering economic development, and all these logs are being exported. It’s to the detriment of the whole of the Alberni Valley.”

The highway clearcut and other controversial Island Timberlands logging plans around the Alberni Valley can be laid squarely at the feet of the Liberal government, which, in 2004, allowed 88,000 hectares of private forest land to be removed from tree farm licences, Fraser said.

“That has completely ringed the Alberni Valley with private lands, so everything is at risk — watersheds, wildlife habitat, wildlife corridors, recreational areas and now tourism.”

Port Alberni Mayor John Douglas said there is sensitivity around the plans.

“I hope it won’t affect the viewscape badly because Port Alberni is not just a logging town any-more, so we are sensitive to these sorts of issues, but it is outside our jurisdiction.”

Douglas said he hopes the harvesting will not affect tourism.

Jane Morden, Watershed Forest Alliance spokeswoman, said Timberlands is going into contentious areas because only remnants of forests with big trees are left.

“It just shows they are not really caring about viewscapes anymore,” she said. “I think this is going to [annoy] a lot of people because they expected them to leave the fringe.”

Link to Times Colonist article: https://www.timescolonist.com/news/local/island-timberlands-logging-of-alberni-summit-could-denude-the-hump-1.50473

You can also get bed bath and beyond printable coupon from that site.

Cortes Island logging dispute moves to the market

As the dispute between Cortes Island residents and Island Timberlands escalates, activists are moving the debate to where it will hurt: the market.

Earlier this month, local residents’ blockades of Island Timberlands’ logging operations resulted in a withdrawal of the crew, but as Zoe Miles from the WildStands Alliance notes, the company has yet to meet Cortes Island homeowners or make any revision to the logging plans. As a result, residents against IT’s industrial scale logging have tracked the raw logs Island Timberlands are exporting to mills in Washington State and to their retail customers and are sending letters to raise awareness about the dispute.

Below is an excerpt of the letter:

Island Timberlands is presently in conflict with the community of Cortes Island over logging of some of the very last stands of old growth forest in the region.

This is a region with extremely little primary forest remaining. In addition, Island Timberlands is in conflict with the community over logging plans in important watersheds and other issues of great concern.

[..]

Since most of the U.S. industry has already made public commitments not to trade in old growth and conflict wood products, we ask that you enforce this commitment by contacting Simpson Lumber and Island Timberlands at the earliest opportunity to advise them that you will have to stop sourcing their products if they do not resolve the conflicts.

We realize you have most likely been caught up in this conflict unwittingly and very much appreciate your positive involvement in resolving the conflicts.

“People working on this (letter-writing) campaign have had experience with similar campaigns in the past, and we’ve seen an effective way of bringing more people into the conversation an creating awareness about the controversial source of the trees,” Miles said over the phone.

“That’s where we saw that consumers and buyers are interested on knowing where their products came from. We believe that not only do [consumers] want to know, but also that they deserve to know that there is so much controversy around their product.”

Tied in with residents’ concerns about IT’s large-scale logging practices is the Chinese Investment Corporation’s 12.5 per cent buy-in bid for Island Timberlands, Miles said.

“There are more shareholders than China Investment Corporation, but 12.5 per cent is a fairly sizable chunk, and there’s going to be more pressure on Island Timberlands to increase the profit margin,” she said, adding that profit margins would be increased not by working with local communities, but by “harvesting the best wood they can and getting [to market] as quickly as possible.”

“There’s a huge concern about where the profits are going to be go, as well as the pressure to increase those profits.”

She added that because Island Timberlands is also a large landowner on Cortes, the idea of foreign ownership didn’t “sit well” with residents.

Island Timberlands did not provide a comment in time for publication.

Read more:  https://www.vancouverobserver.com/blogs/earthmatters/cortes-island-logging-dispute-moves-market

Adrian Dix’s Not-So-Secret Agenda

In his 2011 bid for the NDP leadership, Adrian Dix promised that if he became leader he would commit to: “Developing a long-term strategy for old-growth forests, which would include protection of Avatar Grove and other specific areas subject to immediate logging.” While Avatar Grove is already off-limits to logging, there are several million hectares of endangered old-growth forests in the province that need protecting, and we need a systematic plan to protect them while ensuring sustainable, value-added second-growth forestry. Citizens must hold Dix and all NDP politicians to this promise, as so far they have not re-mentioned this promise since they first wrote it! 
~ Ken Wu, Ancient Forest Alliance

 

A New Democratic Party government led by Adrian Dix would expand child care, reduce fees for seniors’ long-term care, ban the cosmetic use of pesticides, put a moratorium on independent power projects, stop renovictions and create disincentives for exporting raw logs.

A Dix government would start a Ministry of Women’s Equality, get rid of the foundation skills assessment (FSA) for students and allow teachers to negotiate class size and composition as part of their contract bargaining. It would reinstate a tax on financial institutions and raise corporate taxes.

Those commitments and others, all publicly available, run contrary to an assertion that has become common in Victoria that Dix won’t say what he wants to do if the NDP forms government.

With the NDP ahead in the polls, Premier Christy Clark’s talking points in the past year have included suggestions that Dix has a secret plan for the province. The Liberal Party she leads has pushed the theme, often echoed in the media, with a “Searching for Dix’s Hidden Plan” website.

In one year-end interview, Dix said people wanting to know what an NDP government would do should look at what they supported as opposition in the last year, rather than dwelling on what’s been unsaid.

More instructive is to look at what Dix said in early 2011 while he was running for the NDP leadership, a time when he stressed he was being specific about his promises in his appeal to party members to vote for him. They include proposals that would change the economy, health services, education and the environment.

Some of them Dix has repeated frequently since becoming leader, but many of them he has not. While they may not add up to a full platform and they leave policy gaps, it is worth remembering what they were.

Raw logs and women’s equality

While the website for Dix’s succesful leadership bid appears to have disappeared from the internet, The Tyee held onto copies of his announcements. In some cases they are specific about dollar amounts, in some they just indicate his intentions, and in others he identifies policy changes that would transform sectors without great expense to the government.

Following are commitments on some of the province’s higher profile issues:

– Using financial disincentives to discourage raw log exports. “I am calling for a major increase in the provincial fees levied on raw logs harvested on Crown lands for export, and for a new provincial sales or earnings tax on raw logs exported from private forest lands,” he said;

– “I am committed to a Ministry of Women’s Equality to ensure that all agencies and all ministries are moving forward on issues impacting equality for women, including the Premier’s Office,” announced Dix. “The Liberal decision to scrap the ministry was a step backward that I will reverse”;

– “I am also committed to expanding legal aid and supporting and financing women’s centres and centres dealing with violence against women”;

– “I am committed to expand child care, to initiate a provincial childcare system and to pressure Ottawa to play a major role in such a system”;

– Reversing the BC Liberal’s hike in fees for seniors in long-term care, which in 2011 transferred a $54 million government expense to seniors and their families;

– Stopping the smart meter program;

– Placing a moratorium on independent power producer contracts;

– Renewing the B.C. Utilities Commission process to restore public accountability, restoring moves in recent years that took things like smart meters out of the BCUC’s review;

– Enforcing employment standards and improving “the provisions for workers seeking to organize and bargain collectively”;

– Reversing B.C.’s position on the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) with the European Union to protect the province from “soaring” prescription drug and health care costs.

Health and education

Several proposals addressed education:

– “Changing the school funding formula to help keep schools open” and “increasing the resources and services for students”;

– Ending the current Foundation Skills Assessment program (see Sidebar) and replacing it with something more comprehensive;

– Restoring teachers’ right to negotiate class size and composition;

– Eliminating the interest on student loans;

– Creating a grant program for post-secondary students with a budget of $100 million a year, building on a plan to restore grants of $18 million a year distributed based on need, and spending $30 million towards eliminating the interest on student loans.

And the former health critic had several policies aimed at improving care and containing costs, particularly for prescription drugs:

– Requiring B.C. hospitals to buy locally grown food, a move he said would support the province’s agriculture industry and benefit patients;

– Expanding reference-based pricing where the government pays for the lowest cost option when there’s no therapeutic difference between different priced drugs;

– Increasing support for the Therapeutics Initiative (T.I.), a body at the University of British Columbia that gives independent assessments of the evidence on prescription drugs. The T.I. would be given a stronger voice in the province’s drug review process, he said;

– Increasing support for academic detailing, a program where doctors are provided “objective research” on drugs, a way of counterbalancing what they receive in promotions from drug company representatives.

No more ‘renovictions’

Several Dix policies were aimed at improving things for renters:

– “Eliminating problematic sections of the Residential Tenancy Act that permit steep rent increases and tenant harassment, and introducing new rules to end ‘renovictions’ and providing advocacy services for renters.” Dix said he would give existing tenants the right to move back into a renovated suite after a renovation at the same rent they paid previously. He also said he would end the “georgraphic market increase clause” that allows landowners to jack rents when neighbouring renters pay more;

– Landowners would no longer be allowed to ask tenants to voluntarily agree to higher rents, a clause Dix said makes tenants vulnerable to intimidation;

– A “Tenants’ Assistant” program would be available to renters to provide information and advocacy, a service that would be particularly useful to renters whose first language is other than English;

– The residential tenancy office would be required to track and publish statistics on evictions, such as how many were filed, where, whether they were disputed and whether they were overturned.

And there was a long list of environmental commitments:

– Creating a legislature standing committee on sustainability tasked with examining ways the government can integrate sustainability into government policies and monitor progress;

– Developing a long-term strategy for old-growth forests, which would include protection of Avatar Grove and other specific areas subject to immediate logging plans;

– Ending the carbon tax’s revenue neutrality where the amount collected is returned via other tax cuts, and instead using it for transit, energy-efficient infrastructure and other partnerships to reduce greenhouse gas emissions;

– Rewriting the environmental assessment laws to include “sound scientific analysis, genuine participation of the public, full consultation with First Nations and public credibility”;

– Writing long overdue endangered species laws following public hearings on the subject and broad public discussion;

– Holding “accountability reviews” on the public concerns about fracking, sour gas and GHG emissions in oil and gas production;

– Intervening against Enbridge’s proposed Northern Gateway pipeline from Alberta’s “tar sands,” rejection of which would also prevent the growth of oil tanker traffic on the coast;

– Paying for an “energy conservation megaproject” that would see the retrofitting of public and private buildings to reduce their energy use, bills and carbon emissions. Dix did not set a budget or a target number of retrofits, but said “these investments more than pay for themselves through reduced utility and maintenance bills.” They would also generate thousands of jobs, he said;

– Expanding the province’s marine protected areas, stopping commercial development in parks and creating new parks and protected areas where more protection of natural areas is needed;

– Increasing the number of staff in parks to help the public and protect the parks;

– Establishing environmental youth teams, a move that would create summer jobs for young people and provide a pool of labour to work on environmental stewardship projects in parks or elsewhere. Dix proposed to create 1,500 positions through $14.5 million in annual funding;

– Working with First Nations, the forest industry, communities, forest trade unions and conservation groups to develop “new forest management strategies to address carbon sinks, old growth and ongoing transition to second growth utilization”;

– Accelerating the implementation of the Great Bear Rainforest agreements;

– Banning the use of pesticides for cosmetic reasons, to beautify lawns or gardens where there is no health, food protection or environmental reason to use them;

– Introducing a water protection act that would prevent unregulated water pollution, protect groundwater and require management plans for all river basins;

– Closing loopholes that allow properties in the agricultural land reserve to be developed and giving the agricultural land commission enough resources to do its job;

– Establishing an agricultural policy to support local food production, processing and procurement.

Making a mandate

Finally, there were a couple measures aimed at raising revenue, making taxation fairer and paying for some of the commitments Dix made:

– Rolling back corporate taxes to 2008 levels, a reverse of the tax cuts associated with the carbon tax, which would raise government revenue by $385 million;

– Returning the minimum tax on financial institutions to where it was in January 2008, which would bring in $100 million a year.

Dix has since also said he’s open to raising personal income taxes, but only for people with incomes over $150,000.

At least some observers made note of Dix’s promises on the way to the leader’s office. For example, Ken Wu, founder of the Ancient Forest Alliance, was particularly interested in the commitment to develop a strategy for managing the province’s old growth forests.

“There’s no details and he hasn’t repeated it since he became the leader, but we’re going to hold him to it, and all his MLAs and candidates,” said Wu.

The MLA from Cariboo North, Bob Simpson, who parted with the party in 2010 to sit as an independent, has long raised concerns that an NDP government will be elected without any mandate to do anything if they fail to articulate a vision for the province.

“They’ve committed to proving to people they are not the socialist hordes, (so) they’re not being very creative on the revenue side,” Simpson said. “I would like to see more creative thinking around how they’re going to realign the revenue side so they can adress some of the things that need to be addressed on the spending side.”

He questioned the goal of having B.C. be the lowest taxed jurisdiction in Canada. “I think there’s no reason we couldn’t be in the middle,” he said.

The provincial legislature is scheduled to return on Feb. 12 for the speech from the throne, followed by a budget on Feb. 19. It won’t be long after that until all the parties release their platforms with the provincial election set for May 14.

When the NDP releases its platform, it will be interesting to see how well it reflects what Dix committed to during his run for the party leadership.

Read more:  https://thetyee.ca/News/2013/01/09/Adrian-Dix-Agenda/

Red-legged frog.

Give trees (and frogs) a break

As I walked the trails on Cortes Island in British Columbia this summer, beady eyes watched me from the puddles. Sometimes, when I put my foot down, three or four red-legged frogs would leap up and splay in all directions. Now that it is winter, the puddles of summer have expanded into sheets of water. I imagine that the frogs are dozing there, in the slow moving water beneath the canopy of giant trees.

Cortes is very lucky to have forests like this because they are rare and quickly disappearing. Red legged frogs are rare too. They are provincially listed and declining in numbers. On Cortes Island, those rare forests are about to be logged, and the little frogs may be facing their last winter.

Island Timberlands, a privately owned logging company, owns the forest. They plan to start logging any day. They would have started already, except for a band of islanders who created a blockade on the road. As I write this, they are standing guard over the entrance to the forest, willing to risk arrest for the trees.

Cortes Island is not the only place where a community is in a faceoff with IT. People in Port Alberni oppose IT’s industrial logging of McLaughlin Ridge and Cameron Valley Firebreak. In Roberts Creek, it’s Day Road Forest and in Powell River, its Stillwater Bluffs. IT’s logging of the magnificent Cathedral Grove has sparked years of protest and controversy. If IT sells these controversial lands to another timber company, it will probably be for a price that ensures ecosystems, species and jobs still leave B.C.

The province of B.C. is responsible for this broken system. The B.C. Liberals repealed the Forest Land Reserve Act in 2002, and replaced it with the highly flexible, industry-friendly Private Managed Forest Land Act in 2004. Nearly a decade later, we can see the result of this market-based approach.

According to the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, forests are being logged at more than twice the rate that forest auditors say can be sustained; trees are logged at younger and younger ages; more trees get exported as raw logs; and tens of thousands of hectares are being readied for conversion to residential development. Island Timberlands will liquidate all of its Douglas fir forests within 25 years, mostly for export as raw logs. Threatened and endangered species can’t stop the logging: there is no provincial legislation that requires their protection. Tough luck, frogs.

As taxpayers, we should expect the province to protect the lands of B.C. for uses that benefit the citizens of B.C. – especially when the forest companies like Island Timberlands pay such low property tax rates on private land. On Cortes Island, I paid about $62 in taxes in 2011 for each of my 20 inland acres. Island Timberlands paid between $5 and $6 for each of its inland acres near Squirrel Cove. What does the province require from timber companies in exchange for this 90-per-cent reduced tax rate? Sustainable forestry jobs that can support a small community over time? Nope. Value-added manufacturing jobs for the province? Sorry, no. Intact ecosystems for the tourist industry (about $4 million in direct wages for our island)? Again, no.

How, in the face of all this, do we stand up for ourselves, for the forest, and even for the frogs?

Perhaps our best leverage at this point is our voices as voters. If we want healthy forests and our community values that depend on them, then we all need to write to the B.C. provincial government and tell them that it isn’t fair for corporations to benefit from low property tax rates and then manage their land with no benefit to B.C.

Tell them that destroying ecosystems and exporting raw logs is not a reasonable trade-off for low tax rates. We need regulations that protect jobs and ecosystems, including protection for the habitat of declining species like the red legged frog. While you are at it, ask that funds be allocated for places like Cortes Island. Cortes residents seek a mix of park land and ecosystem-based logging that will support the local economy. Other communities have different needs. Roberts Creek, for example, seeks expansion of the Mount Elphinstone Provincial Park.

If enough people raise their voices, we could act as the stewards the forests need. This holiday season, you and I could give a lasting gift to the trees, and the frogs and countless other animals and plants that are sustained by them.

As for me, I’ve seen the magic of old forests and I want my grandchildren to see it – and yours as well. So I’m going to push the province for a fair approach to private forest lands and support those blockaders on Cortes Island.

After all, I’ve got those beady little eyes watching me.

Carrie Saxifrage is a writer with a background in law. She lived on Cortes Island for 15 years and will return to the island when her son graduates from high school.

Old-growth Douglas-fir trees on Cortes Island.

Province forsaken its role on Cortes

The War in the Woods has changed complexion since I first started covering hostilities more than 20 years ago as an environmental war correspondent in the Clayoquot Sound combat zone.

For me, the fight in those days was defined by brazen environmental opportunists like MP Svend (White Swan) Robinson who was most dangerous if you happened to be standing between him and a TV camera. This news just in — I was not a friend of the environment movement.

Jump ahead two decades and we find a much different contest being waged on the forest floor and in the boardrooms. While the spoils of war are still the remaining stands of old growth and the ecosystems that support them, the field of battle has shifted and the combatants’ tactics have evolved.

A good example of changing times is the current environment-versus-logging impasse on Cortes Island. It is more a war of words and diplomacy than the bitter blockade combat that defined the Clayoquot. The land in question is not public, it is private. And the gulf island ecosystem in question is not just sensitive, it is hyper-sensitive.

On Cortes, at least, the face of the environment movement has changed. The patchouli anarchy that defined it 20 years ago has mellowed and matured. The career enviros are still there, but their ranks have filled out with an eclectic gathering of regular folks — from kids to their grandparents to more than a few retired loggers.

Currently, an unofficial time out is being observed in the standoff between Cortes Island’s environmental activists and Island Timberlands, a subsidiary of Wall Street giant Brookfield Asset Management.

It should be noted that while this drama plays out on tiny Cortes, the Brookfield boardroom is in a state of high anxiety because of China Investment Corp. (CIC) is considering purchasing a sizeable chunk of Island Timberlands. CIC is the investment arm of the People’s Republic of China with $200 billion of China’s foreign exchange reserves to play with. No pressure there.

On Cortes, three things are remarkable. First, the resident environmentalists and Timberlands have been debating the company’s logging plans for about four years without coming to serious blows.

Second, the environmentalists are not trying to ban logging altogether. They are asking for Timberlands to adopt an ecosystem-based approach — eco-code for selective logging that spares old growth.

Third, Timberlands has exercised a measure of restraint and has not immediately sought an injunction. Efforts are being made to bring the two sides together for what the environmentalists call “an informed discussion about the best use of the resource.”

Back in the early 1990s, the provincial government was fully engaged attempting to referee such conflicts even though there was precious little common ground. Twenty years later, with dialogue increasingly in vogue, the question is: Where is the provincial government?

A big issue in the Cortes dispute is the extent to which our government regulates activity on private land. The private foresters claim they are governed by more than 30 acts and regulations. However, the environmentalists say companies like Timberlands are allowed to apply a model of “professional reliance” which means that there is little meaningful regulatory oversight.

It’s a pity the current administration has all but forsaken its role as steward and peacekeeper in the woods. A measure of leadership would go a long way right about now.

[Monday Mag article no longer available]

OUR VIEW: Provincial oversight missing in Cortes logging dispute

The current impasse over logging on private land on Cortes Island is unique by B.C. standards. In a province where wars in the woods have often been bitterly waged, the Cortes standoff stands apart.

Cortes environmentalists and Island Timberlands have been debating the company’s logging plans for about four years without coming to serious blows. The islanders are not trying to ban logging altogether, they are asking for Timberlands to adopt an ecosystem-based, selective logging harvesting plan that spares old growth.

And, Timberlands, which is owned by Wall Street giant Brookfield Asset Management, has exercised a measure of restraint and has not immediately sought an injunction to gain access to the property.

As encouraging as this is, there is something glaringly absent in the debate – provincial government stewardship. There can be no lasting resolution of the Cortes Island conflict unless it can be demonstrated that logging on the company’s private land is subject to diligent regulatory oversight. Private land logging companies claim they are subject to more than 30 provincial acts and regulations.

But, the environmentalists counter-claim that the industry uses a model of professional reliance which means that there is no real government oversight and private land foresters ultimately get to decide what constitutes compliance.

Further complicating the Cortes Island impasse are global investment forces over which Cortes has no control. China Investment Corp.(CIC), the state-owned investment arm of the People’s Republic of China, is interested in purchasing a significant percentage of Island Timberlands. CIC is an investment powerhouse with approximately $200 billion of China’s foreign exchange reserves to play with.

The notion that the fate of old growth stands on tiny Cortes Island will be debated and determined in part by faceless Communist Party plutocrats in Beijing is kind of scary. The scenario is made more scary by the fact that our provincial government seems to have abandoned all caring for commercial logging on private land.

Read article:  https://www.campbellrivermirror.com/opinion/183084691.html

Ancient Forest Alliance

Global TV News – Echo Lake & Bald Eagles

Direct link to YouTube clip: www.youtube.com/watch?v=mJcMg48bT10

Please SIGN our PETITION at: ancientforestalliance.org/ways-to-take-action-for-forests/petition/

Echo Lake is a spectacular, unprotected, lowland ancient forest near Agassiz, BC on the east side of the Lower Fraser Valley. It is in the unceded territory of the Sts’ailes First Nations band (formerly the Chehalis Indian Band). The area is home to perhaps the largest concentration of bald eagles on Earth, where thousands of eagles come each fall to eat spawning salmon in the Harrison and Chehalis Rivers and hundreds roost in the old-growth trees at night around Echo Lake. It is also home to bears, cougars, deer, mountain goats, and osprey, and was historically populated by the critically endangered northern spotted owl.

The vigilance of local landowners on the east side of Echo Lake, whose private lands restrict access to the old-growth forests on the Crown lands on the west side of the lake, have held-off industrial logging of the lake’s old-growth forests for decades. Local conservationists are interested in increased protections for eagles in the Harrison/Chehalis area and the protection of the Echo Lake Ancient Forest where the eagles roost at night.