B.C.’s Big Trees Are Now Tracked In UBC’s Online Database (PHOTOS)

Here in B.C. we have an abundance of large, gorgeous trees.

But some are so big and beautiful that we can't get them out of our heads (who could forget Big Lonely Doug?). For those, the University of British Columbia has relaunched the BC Big Tree Registry.

Newly acquired by the university's Faculty of Forestry, the database keeps track of our province's biggest and brightest trees. The registry is now online so that people can use interactive maps to search for big trees in their areas. Users can also nominate big trees for verification by an expert.

B.C. is home to 50 different tree species, according to Sally Aitken, a UBC professor of forest and conservation sciences.

Big trees “are the largest organisms that we can see, touch and feel,” she said in a UBC interview. “We have trees that were around before our parents or great-grandparents or great-great-grandparents were born. These massive and beautiful organisms represent a biological legacy.”

So if you ever needed an excuse to explore more of this great province of ours, here it is. Give the trees a hug for us!

Read more and VIEW PHOTOS and VIDEO at: https://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2014/09/26/bc-big-trees-photos_n_5891200.html?utm_hp_ref=canada-british-columbia
 

BC.’s biggest trees can now be found online

Ever walked through a forest in B.C. and encountered a giant tree that left you awestruck?

The University of B.C.’s Faculty of Forestry is looking for help from the public to help identify the largest trees of each species in B.C.

The faculty has revamped its B.C. Big Tree registry for people to nominate their favorite majestic giant tree.

All you have to do is record the location and measure the tree trunk circumference, height — there are mobile phone apps that allow you to use a smartphone as an ‘inclinometer’ to measure the height of a tree — the location (GPS coordinates) and a photo of the tree.

A tree expert will verify whether the tree is the largest of its kind in the province or is just a spectacular example of its species.

The registry helps conserve big trees in B.C. and educates citizens about the giants living among us.

“We think the biggest ones haven’t been found yet,” explained Sally Aitken, a UBC professor of forest and conservation sciences.

“If we want to conserve them, we have to find them and identify them,” she said Thursday.

What makes big trees so special is that they are living legacies of ancient forests, Aitken said.

The oldest have been standing for up to 1,800 years, she said.

“They are the biggest living organisms we can feel, touch and even hug if we want to. They are a biological legacy of the past.”

Aitken said our coastal rainforests have some enormous Douglas-fir, western redcedar, and Sitka spruce trees, including some of the world’s largest specimens, mainly because of the climate conditions: mild year-round temperatures and lots of rainfall.

The province is home to 50 different tree species, including the largest trees in Canada and almost as large as the biggest trees in the world — the redwoods of California.

Aitken said the original B.C. Big Tree registry was started in the 1980s by outdoorsman Randy Stoltmann, who died in a mountaineering accident in 1994.

Until recently, the registry was on paper, contained in cardboard boxes. The UBC forestry department now has transformed it into an online resource, making it easy for the public to access and nominate trees for consideration.

It also allows people to use interactive maps to locate the largest, oldest trees near their homes, which UBC forestry is encouraging people to do as part of National Forest Week.

For more info, go to the B.C. Big Tree Registry website.

Below is a video of Canada’s second largest tree found last spring near Port Renfrew on Vancouver Island. It’s known as Big Lonely Doug because the 70-metre tall Douglas-fir is located in a clearcut.

Read more and view PHOTOS and VIDEO at: https://metronews.ca/news/vancouver/1166538/b-c-s-biggest-trees-can-now-be-found-online/

Help needed to ID monster trees

The University of B.C. recently took on the task of turning “several bankers’ boxes of paper and physical photos” on the province’s largest trees into a usable online database — and they want the public to add to it.

The idea is that if we know where British Columbia’s largest trees are, they can be protected and studied, according to UBC forests and conservation prof. Sally Aitken.

“Those big trees really represents a biological legacy from the past. We want to maintain that legacy,” she said.

“We don’t know how these trees are going to react to climate change, to the new environment they find themselves in — if we know where they are now, it gives us a basis to monitor them.”

B.C., Aitken said, is home to some of the largest trees in the world. And despite how the existing paper-based records go back to 1986 and already contain 300 of the province’s most enormous trees, new discoveries are still regularly found.

“In the last month, we have found the third-biggest Sitka spruce in the province. In the spring, the tree that got quite a bit of press — called Big Lonely Doug — was found. It’s near Port Renfrew, it’s the second largest Douglas fir.”

Even for the existing trees in the registry, much of the data is incomplete. Many of the old records didn’t come with exact GPS co-ordinates or even directions to how to find the trees.

Technology now, however, means anyone with a smart phone can track their GPS co-ordinates and also measure the height of trees using a simple “clinometer” app that uses distance and angles to complete the measurements.

The tree registry can be found online at bigtrees.forestry.ubc.ca.

Read more:[Original article no longer available]

UBC to track B.C.’s largest trees: re-launches database

UBC has re-launched their big tree database, cataloging the biggest trees in B.C.

The registry has been revamped and is now available online to the general public.

Users can search for big trees near their homes using interactive maps.

With the new database, anyone can nominate a big tree for verification by a tree expert.

To view the database, go to bigtrees.forestry.ubc.ca

VIEW VIDEO at: https://globalnews.ca/news/1583769/ubc-to-track-b-c-s-largest-trees-re-launches-database/

Big trees bring out our inner tree hugger

We go searching for them, we hug them, we’re often speechless in their presence, but what makes big trees so special? Sally Aitken, a professor of forest and conservation sciences, explains the connection we feel to these majestic giants of the forest. The Faculty of Forestry now runs the BC Big Tree Registry, a database of the biggest specimens in the province.

Why do we love big trees?

They are the largest organisms that we can see, touch and feel. They’re often very old and the idea of something that lives much longer than our human lifespan is interesting. We have trees that were around before our parents or great-grandparents or great-great-grandparents were born. These massive and beautiful organisms represent a biological legacy. We’ve harvested a lot of our old forests and those big trees that remain become more precious because there are fewer of them around.

What makes B.C.’s big trees unique?

The zone that extends from California to B.C. is one of two places where we find the biggest and tallest trees in the world. Our coastal rainforests harbour some absolutely enormous tress and it has to do with the conditions we find here–mild year-round temperatures and lots of rainfall. We have enormous Douglas-fir, Western redcedar, and Sitka spruce. The province is home to 50 different tree species and for some of those species we have the world’s largest specimens. We have the largest trees in Canada by far and ours are almost as big as the biggest trees in the world, the redwoods of California.

People are able to nominate trees into the BC Big Tree Registry. Are new big ones still being found?

It’s very exciting that trees are still getting nominated that are champion trees. Recently a group on the Sunshine Coast found some of the largest mountain hemlocks that have ever been observed. The sadder tales are the ones of trees like the ‘Big Lonely Doug,’ the second largest Douglas-fir in the province.

A lot of nominations come in from people who work in forestry and in logging. These people find trees in areas that people don’t normally walk through. Of course, there are also a number of people, including those on the Big Tree Committee, whose hobby is finding big trees. Big tree hunters love to go out to areas that haven’t been explored and look for big trees.

One member of our committee said there are big ones that are still out there to find. We want to make anyone a big tree hunter or nominator and we’ve made changes to the BC Big Tree Registry so that anyone can nominate a big tree.

What can we learn from older trees?

We know that the mortality rates of old trees are increasing with climate change. The registry helps us and citizens monitor the health of these giants over time. People will tell us if a big tree blows over, loses its top, or dies. The registry also produces data on the type of ecosystems that these trees are found in, and this information can guide certain research. We need to know where these big trees are so we can conserve them, as a biological legacy of the past, as important members of forest ecosystems today, and for future generations.

As part of National Forest Week the Faculty of Forestry is holding an event on Thursday, Sep. 25 to celebrate the BC Big Tree Registry that will include a tree climbing demonstration.

See article and view video of Climbing Big Lonely Doug at: https://news.ubc.ca/2014/09/24/big-trees-bring-out-our-inner-tree-hugger/

Ancient Forest Alliance

OPINION: Torrance Coste: No right time to create more tree-farm licences

 

Have you ever had a friend who just won’t listen when everyone is telling them to get out of an unhealthy relationship? That’s what comes to mind when I think of the B.C. government’s relationship with tree-farm licences. No matter how many British Columbians speak out to say they’re a bad idea, every year the provincial government renews its push for more TFLs.

In 2013, the Minister of Forests quietly tried to rush a bill through the legislature to enable conversions of public-forest lands from volume-based tenures to area-based tenures, or TFLs. The alarm was raised by First Nations, unions, forestry experts, opposition party members and environmental groups such as the Wilderness Committee, because this would give too much control to giant logging corporations. The backlash and public outcry forced the government to shelve the legislation.

This year, the government hired former B.C. chief forester Jim Snetsinger to lead a review and write a report on how to create more TFLs. The report was released just before the Labour Day long weekend.

First, it’s worth noting a few positives about the report’s release. After receiving it, the government stated it won’t introduce legislation to create more TFLs this year or in the spring of 2015, citing the landmark Tsilhqot’in decision by the Supreme Court as a reason for holding off. The report also recognizes the importance of community support and acknowledges the lack of social licence as an impediment to creating more TFLs.

This is a big shift from past forest policy in B.C., where social licence has been an afterthought, if considered at all.

To many, this is seen as a victory for the thousands of British Columbians who spoke out against TFLs during the review. But on the whole, the report misses the mark, failing to recognize the major shortcomings of existing TFLs and leaving the door open for new ones.

The government’s rationale for more TFLs is to stabilize timber supply and improve the economy in forest communities. But even the government’s own statistics show that these arguments are astonishingly weak.

Between 1990 and 2011, just over a third of the mills in the B.C. Interior closed. On the coast, where TFLs cover far more land than in the Interior, more than half of all mills closed, and that’s without the presence of the mountain pine beetle. On the coast, the proportion of raw log exports (an extremely controversial practice vehemently opposed by forest workers’ unions and environmentalists alike) is a staggering 13 times higher than in the Interior.

The government claims more TFLs will help small community and family-owned forest companies. Again, this is a far cry from the reality. Across B.C., 80 per cent of the harvest from TFLs is done by just five huge companies.

This corporate domination was a primary concern during the review period. Even the CEO of logging giant Canfor acknowledged this, stating public opposition was too strong and that now “is absolutely not the time to make changes in tenure administration.” Snetsinger’s report briefly mentions these concerns, but doesn’t make concrete recommendations that would limit corporate control in B.C.’s forests.

The report then recommends increased consultation, review and monitoring for any new TFLs, all of which probably isn’t possible in today’s understaffed and underfunded Ministry of Forests.

Finally, the report states that the review received lots of input on expanding TFLs, both in favour and opposed. This suggests that there were as many people supporting the government’s agenda as there were in opposition, which is inaccurate. Out of 4,300 written submissions, only 15 were in favour of more TFLs.

There’s no question we need to make some big changes in forest management in B.C. Our top priorities should include banning raw-log exports and prioritizing local jobs, ensuring First Nations have access to forest resources they’ve used since time immemorial and conserving remaining old-growth forests to preserve wildlife, protect drinking water sources and sequester climate-changing carbon.

Increasing corporate control by creating more TFLs would make all of this harder to achieve.

The strongest part of the report is that it acknowledges the public’s desire to address the future of forestry in B.C. Every time we’ve had the chance to comment on forest management, people across the province have called on the government to end the corporate stranglehold on public forests.

We can’t just take a “break” from TFLs until after the spring of 2015. It’s time to end this relationship for good.

Read more: https://www.timescolonist.com/opinion/op-ed/torrance-coste-no-right-time-to-create-more-tree-farm-licences-1.1384898

B.C. First Nation is set to declare a vast chunk of the Chilcotin as a tribal park

A B.C. First Nation is set to declare a vast chunk of the Chilcotin as a tribal park, including the site of the controversial proposed New Prosperity mine at Fish Lake.

A formal ceremony unveiling Dasiqox Tribal Park is set for Oct. 4, less than four months after a landmark Supreme Court of Canada ruling found that the Tsilhqot’in people have title to 1,750 square kilometres of land west of Williams Lake.

Taseko Mines Ltd.’s Fish Lake property lies outside the title area recognized by the courts, but the natives — who have long opposed the mine and claim hunting, fishing, and trapping rights in the area — have now folded the mine site into the tribal park boundary.

Questions immediately arise as to the validity of the tribal park declaration and what it means for the future of the $1.1-billion New Prosperity copper-gold project.

Brian Battison, vice-president of corporate affairs for Taseko, said Wednesday he is aware of the forthcoming ceremony but could not comment until he knows more details. “I don’t really know what it means. I don’t know what a tribal park is, how it’s constituted, and what may or may not be allowed.”

The tribal park would cover about 3,120 square kilometres and protect cultural, heritage and ecological values, according to the Tsilhqot’in, while connecting to five surrounding provincial parks.

Dave Williams, president of Friends of the Nemiah Valley, which works closely with the Tsilhqot’in people on conservation projects, explained in an interview that large-scale industrial mining and clear-cut logging would not be allowed in the tribal park, but that smaller-scale resource activities such as sustainable logging with portable mills may be suitable to provide employment for natives.

“Their view is this is their sovereign territory,” Williams said. “People going into the territory and applying for licences of occupation or permits … will have to go through the First Nations government.”

He said the tribal park declaration is unilateral for now, but his long-term hope is that the province could come on board under a joint management system similar to the Stein Valley Nlaka’pamux Heritage Park, established near Lytton in 1995.

Premier Christy Clark and John Rustad, Minister of Aboriginal Relations and Reconciliation, were in the Nemiah Valley on Wednesday, signing a letter of understanding that commits to building a more positive relationship with the Tsilhqot’in nation.

Communications officer Leanne Ritchie released a ministry statement saying the province had not received details of the tribal park, but hoped that the letter of understanding would provide the basis for future talks.

An August 2014 inventory report by consultant Wayne McCrory for the Xeni Gwet’in and Yunesit’in First Nations, with about 850 band members, noted that the area features a unique “rain shadow” forest ecosystem and some of the best habitat for large carnivores in North America.

Due to logging and mining threats, McCrory concluded: “The only option to protect this rich cultural/heritage landscape is through a designation of full protection status, such as a combined Tribal Park/provincial Class A Park or Conservancy.”

Taseko’s gold-copper mine project was approved by the provincial government, but twice rejected by federal panels and the federal government. Both federal panels cited damage to fish and fish habitat.

Even though Taseko changed its plans to preserve Fish Lake, which would have been destroyed in its first plan, the second panel review found the mine would result in the loss of Little Fish Lake to a 12-square-kilometre tailings pond and contaminate nearby Fish Lake and the upper Fish Creek system.

Taseko maintains the environmental review was badly flawed, saying it incorrectly assessed the project and its ability to prevent seepage from a tailings pond. Its legal challenge is before the Federal Court of Appeal, with a ruling possible before the end of the year.

First Nations are set to officially announce Dasiqox (“there for us”) Tribal Park in a ceremony at Fish Lake, also known as Teztan Biny, about 100 kilometres southwest of Williams Lake. Nuu-chah-nulth carver Tim Paul has donated a totem pole for the event.

Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada could not immediately comment on the tribal park designation.

On Monday, Taseko — which runs the Gibraltar copper-molybdenum mine 65 kilometres north of Williams Lake — announced a friendly $79-million takeover of Curis Resources, which is developing a copper project in Arizona.

lpynn@vancouversun.com

What a Dasiqox Tribal Park would help to protect:

(1) Would connect five surrounding parks: Ts’yl?os, Big Creek, Nunsti, Big Creek, and Southern Chilcotin Mountains.

(2) More than 10,000 hectares of threatened white bark pine forest, perhaps the largest and healthiest such stands remaining in Western Canada, not decimated by white pine blister rust, the mountain pine beetle, and wildfires driven by climate change.

(3) The last viable refuge for the dryland grizzly bear, which historically occurred down the western mountains of North America in the lee of the coast ranges. The diet of these grizzlies ranges from white bark pine nuts to salmon.

(4) Important spawning habitat for chinook, sockeye, and coho salmon, having made lengthy journeys via the Fraser and Chilcotin rivers; the low sockeye run in Yohetta Creek is considered a unique genetic stock that is endangered.

(5) Migratory routes for mule deer as well as ancient Tsilhqot’in trails, both local and long-distance, some of them thought to date back thousands of years.

Source: Inventory report by consultant Wayne McCrory.

Read more: https://www.vancouversun.com/news/metro/Unilateral+park+declared+Tsilhqot+includes+Prosperity+mine/10192766/story.html#ixzz3D4RT0pgo

Native Tree and Shrub Planting in Portage Park (View Royal) on Sept.14

Join the Greater Victoria Green Team, Ecological Pathfinder volunteers of Portage Park, and Ancient Forest Alliance for a fun day of planting trees and shrubs in the beautiful Portage Park (View Royal). An ecological restoration project has been taking place in Portage Park, with the removal of 1000s of pounds of invasive plants over the last year! Now we need to re-plant native trees and shrubs as the next step to improve the ecological integrity and health of this habitat.

Join a group of volunteers and learn about the ecology of Vancouver Island’s amazing forests, native plants, and help restore the native ecosystem. Thanks to the support of the Evergreen Foundation and Canon.

Date: Sunday, September 14
Time: 9:45am to 2pm (Stay for as long as you want, and if you need to leave early that is okay!)

Tools, refreshments, and training will be provided!

Join the event and RSVP here: https://www.meetup.com/Greater-Victoria-Green-Team/events/201693132/

For more info contact Amanda at: amanda@greenteamscanada.ca

Great News! BC Government Backs Down from Tree Farm Licence Expansion Plans for Now – THANK YOU for Speaking Up!

Recently, just before the Labour Day weekend, the BC government quickly mentioned that they have no immediate plans to introduce any legislation to expand Tree Farm Licences across British Columbia in 2014 or in the spring. This proposal has been a recurring scheme by the BC Liberal government – proposed before the 2013 BC election and then again this year until now – to give exclusive logging rights to major logging companies on vast areas of BC’s public forest lands. Each time, a massive public uproar has played an important role in preventing this “forest giveaway scheme” from being implemented!

THANK YOU to the many thousands of our supporters who formed the numeric bulk of the opposition speaking up against this proposal (see www.BCForestMovement.com), to the many First Nations who voiced their concerns and especially to the Tsilhqot’in First Nation who recently won the land title case in the Supreme Court, which was a fundamental reason for the BC government backing down. We must stay vigilant in case the relentless BC Liberal government tries again to attempt such a plan in the future.

[Original article in Clearwater Times no longer available]

Ancient Forest Alliance

SRD buys valuable piece of real estate

The Strathcona Regional District has agreed to purchase a hotly debated piece of property for nearly $1 million.

After five years of negotiations with Island Timberlands, the owner of the 70-acre greenspace on Cortes Island, the property is expected to soon belong to the regional district.

Island Timberlands accepted an offer of $839,000 for the property, known as Whaletown Commons, which is appraised at $826,000 ($475,000 for the timber and $351,000 for the land).

The Whaletown Commons Society, a non-profit which has been trying to secure the land for more than 20 years, is partnering with the regional district and has agreed to chip in roughly $73,000 towards the purchase with its share raised through local donations.

Cortes Director Noba Anderson told her constituents in a newsletter in June that the regional district has more than $571,000 in community parks reserve funds that it’s prepared to contribute towards the purchase.

Anderson said she’s pleased the regional district was able to secure the land for Cortes residents to enjoy for years to come.

“I am beyond delighted that this long-standing community park priority has finally become a reality,” Anderson said in a news release. “The purchase of Whaletown Commons is a rare opportunity to secure 70 acres of green-space in the centre of a neighbourhood, and I am honoured to be part of making this happen.”

The Whaletown Commons Society, which was formed with the sole purpose of keeping the greenspace as parkland, wants to use the property to create a community park in Whaletown and to provide a spot for potential re-location of some of the community’s public assembly buildings.

The greenspace is a valuable piece of land because of its high forest and riparian values, salmon-bearing Burnside Creek, and it provides a natural habitat for wolves and other animals.

It also connects three Whaletown sub-neighbourhoods and is set to become the first formal and permanent park in the Whaletown/Gorge area.

Anderson assured Cortes Islanders last month that the regional district has no interest in developing the property.

“It is important to underline that this park would be purchased as a green space – and a green space only,” Anderson wrote on Cortes’ online site, Tideline, in June. “What becomes of it in the future will be up to the community and the limitations of the covenant (on the land).”